Steve Simon on Culture‑Based Safety and Grassroots Leadership

An interview on large‑scale safety culture change in complex organizations (GE, GM, PSE&G and more).

By Steven I. Simon, Ph.D.

Print
Email
LinkedIn
Author(s)
Steve I. Simon
Steven I. Simon, Ph.D.
President, CCC

PS: You've been part of major safety culture initiatives at large companies such as GE, GM and New Jersey's PSE&G. What do you find most surprising at the start of the change process at huge organizations like these?

Steve:

People often don’t know what they’re getting into with real culture change. Change leaders tend to apply familiar models based on the implementation of other initiatives in their organizations. But such models don’t usually engage them in the kind of direct interaction among people at all levels that enables true culture transformation, as distinguished from programmatic system changes. There are also unanticipated demands on leaders—not so much for conventional resources (e.g., staff time, budget, training), but for putting more of their own skin in the game.

PS:Your expertise is in psychology. How much does the successful implementation of culture change hinge on understanding the psychological aspects of the different roles in a work environment?

Steve:

Respectful attunement to people's differing experiences, perspectives and beliefs counts far more than training in a particular academic discipline when it comes to mounting a successful culture change initiative. My educational background buttressed my development of the methodology, but what is to be prized in facilitating large-scale culture change is less academic preparation than the people skills it takes to work up, down and across an organizational community.

“Culture‑based safety looks at the entire apple tree instead of focusing on each individual apple. Make the whole tree healthy and the individual apples will be healthy, too.” — Steve Simon

PS:Grassroots Safety Leadership is a methodology you developed for implementing large-scale culture change in manufacturing organizations. How did this methodology evolve? Was there one seed idea or incident that sparked it all?

Steve:

When I started work in safety culture almost 30 years ago, I realized that culture change was not a program but a journey and that it had to engage all members of the organizational com-munity. There's a difference between employee involvement-already a popular theme then and employee leadership. If cultures are shaped by leaders, then the only way frontline culture can change is if it is driven by the frontline leaders, the grassroots. That's not as simple to implement as it might sound. Genuinely empowering grassroots leaders is the product of a complex set of interventions.

PS:Can you identify the four key phases to the process of culture change and share a best practice for each?

Steve:

Phase one is enlisting and educating lead-ers. Crucial here is taking it slow and providing a broad grounding in organizational and safety culture to a critical mass of the joint leadership.

Phase two is assessing the culture. No assessment is complete until you've spoken directly with enough individuals across the workforce to ensure that you've captured the unquantifiables, or the culture's history, narratives and underlying assumptions.

Phase three is driving change from the grass-roots. That entails setting up an infrastructure sturdy enough to empower frontline workers to exercise real leadership toward driving change, as opposed to just sitting on management committees.

Phase tour is designing and implementing culture-based projects. Managers and frontline employees alike must be equipped with the tools they ll need to target and develop projects that affect cultural norms, behaviors and beliefs.

PS:You advocate the formation and training of teams, specifically grassroots teams and guidance teams. Can you explain the difference between them and why you believe the two-tier structure works best?

Steve:

A grassroots safety team is comprised primarily of frontline workers. A guidance team is a mixed-level group of site leaders. When we started to drive safety culture change through grassroots teams, encouraging their development of culture improvement projects, we found they were nearly always successful during the first year when they typically had a sponsor to support them. However, we noticed that support for the grassroots teams, and consequently their perfor-mance, declined dramatically when the sponsors who formed them abandoned their roles or moved to other jobs. Clearly the engagement of a sponsor matters, and it one sponsor is good, a team of sponsors—a guidance team-is better.

PS:What advice do you offer safety directors who feel defeated within their corporate cultures?

Steve:

It's a fallacy that culture change has to be driven from the top at the very beginning of a satety culture journey. That is not to say that top management commitment or support is option-al—it's not—but, surpnsingly, it doesn't necessar-ly have to be there from day one. Demonstrating success in even a small area that may be off upper management's radar will eventually make its way onto their screen. Many times a safety director champions a culture change before top management fully buys in. I say to start any place that has an accepting leader or an enthusiastic culture change champion. Sometimes that might be only in a pilot group in a single department. Sometimes it will mean starting at the edge of a corporation or plant and working slowly into the center. Sometimes it can be starting at the bottom and working up to the top. Often once senior managers see results, they want to own them.

PS:How would you contrast culture-based safety and behavior-based safety?

Steve:

Culture-based safety looks at the entire apple tree instead of focusing as behavior-based safety does on each individual apple. Make the whole tree healthy and the individual apples will be healthy, too. The premise of culture-based safety is that the individual's behavior is a product of the group's culture and particularly of the norms mirrored and modeled by leaders, formal and informal. Accordingly, it is in the groups that make up an organization that sustainable change needs to take place. Behavior change without culture change won't last.

PS:How would you handle a company with employees who may be resistant to or skeptical of the culture change process?

Steve:

That someone is "resistant to change" implies that there is a sacred truth and s/he doesn't get it. But members of a work community are the experts in their own work culture. They have reasons for what they believe and those reasons must be respected as experience-based conclusions that identify real barriers which should be looked at. If someone says, "that won't work here," that person is often right. What you want to know, toward giving the change process the best chance, is why it won't work. Resistance and skepticism provide opportunities to engage people about how they see the world. If you take the time for authentic dialogue in which people feel their points of view are respected, then they will frequently open their minds to new ideas. More so if they see that they ve been helpful in similar settings.

As Published in
PS Journal

Professional Safety

Related Topics

Related Articles

Scroll to Top